APRIL 11 — The ongoing efforts to negotiate an end to the United States–Iran conflict reveal not only the complexity of diplomacy, but also the shifting cast of political...
and enjoy FREE RM10 & when you sign up using code VERSAMM10 with min. cash of RM100 today! T&Cs apply.APRIL 11 — The ongoing efforts to negotiate an end to the United States–Iran conflict reveal not only the complexity of diplomacy, but also the shifting cast of political actors shaping its direction.
Among them, one figure has remained conspicuously quiet throughout the war that began on February 28, 2026: JD Vance.Some political observers suggest that this restraint was deliberate, aimed at preserving his standing within a distinct MAGA constituency that is wary of prolonged foreign entanglements. That positioning has now shifted. Donald Trump has brought JD Vance directly into the negotiation process.Vance’s relative distance from the war effort now becomes an asset. Compared to figures such as Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, he appears less politically burdened, and therefore more flexible in testing compromises.Trump, for his part, remains consistent in his strategic instinct. He is not irrational. He is negotiating a new maritime order that Israel has brought him into, which he now wants to extricate himself from. War, in his worldview, is often a prelude to negotiation — a means of accumulating leverage before returning to the table to extract concessions. Yet even as new actors enter the negotiation room in Islamabad, the structure of the talks remains too narrow. If the objective is not merely to stop the war but to stabilize the global system that has been shaken by it, then the negotiations must expand beyond the immediate parties. This is especially true for maritime stakeholders.Its consequences ripple across the Indian Ocean and into Southeast Asia, particularly the Strait of Malacca — the most critical chokepoint in global trade. In this context, the three littoral states of the Strait of Malacca — Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia — should be formally included as observers in the Islamabad negotiations. This is not a matter of prestige. It is a matter of systemic necessity to preserve the importance of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea , which Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore all share. First, these three countries collectively manage and safeguard one of the busiest and most strategically vital sea lanes in the world. Any disruption in the Strait of Hormuz will inevitably divert traffic, alter shipping routes, and increase pressure on the Strait of Malacca.Second, Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia possess decades of experience in cooperative maritime governance. Through coordinated patrols, information-sharing mechanisms, and anti-piracy operations, they have demonstrated that sovereignty and collaboration can coexist. This experience is directly relevant to the current challenge of securing safe passage in contested waters.A process that involves only the primary belligerents risks being perceived as narrow and self-serving. By contrast, the presence of neutral or semi-neutral observers from Southeast Asia would signal that the negotiations are attentive to the broader international community.Singapore, as one of the world’s leading port hubs, depends on uninterrupted maritime flows. Malaysia and Indonesia, with their extensive coastlines and proximity to key shipping routes, are equally exposed to disruptions. Their economic stability — and by extension, Asean’s stability — is directly tied to the outcome of these negotiations.The strategic linkage between the Strait of Hormuz and the Strait of Malacca cannot be overstated. Energy flows from the Gulf pass through Hormuz, traverse the Indian Ocean, and funnel into Malacca before reaching East Asia.If Hormuz is disrupted, Malacca becomes congested.If security risks increase, insurance premiums surge.They are part of a single, integrated maritime system. To negotiate the future of one without consulting the guardians of the other is strategically short-sighted.The inclusion of Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia as observers in Islamabad would not complicate the negotiations.It would bring practical maritime experience into the discussion.And it would ensure that any agreement reached is grounded in the realities of global trade flows. At a time when diplomacy must move beyond bilateral bargaining to systemic stabilisation, widening the table is not optional. It is essential.It must be constructed with all stakeholders in mind. And for a world whose economic lifelines run through both Hormuz and Malacca, the voices of the littoral states are not peripheral. They are indispensable. * Phar Kim Beng is a professor of Asean Studies and director at the Institute of International and Asean Studies, International Islamic University of Malaysia. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of
JD Vance Donald Trump Strait Of Malacca UN Convention On The Law Of The Sea Islamabad Negotiations
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Japanese Researchers Discover Why Cats Stop Eating Mid-MealYOUR DAILY BUNGKUS OF NEWS, EVENTS, POP CULTURE & HOT TEA.
Read more »
Malaysia in the line of fire in a global polycrisis: Future-based strategic adaptation now a necessity — Phar Kim BengAPRIL 10 — Malaysia is not on the battlefield in West Asia. Yet, it is already in the line of fire.The ongoing disruptions in and around the Strait of Hormuz are not distant...
Read more »
Why the US-Iran ceasefire is seen as a failure for Donald TrumpFOR many Malaysians navigating city life, the idea of home has taken on a more personal meaning.
Read more »
Why a single strait in the Middle East can raise prices in Malaysia overnight — Andrew WoonAPRIL 10 — In our hyper-connected world, a flare-up thousands of kilometres away in the Middle East can hit Malaysian wallets almost instantly. The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow...
Read more »
Why adjustment following global shocks cannot wait — Goh Lim ThyeAPRIL 10 — Global uncertainty is often discussed in abstract terms, but recent events have made it tangible. The escalation of conflict in the Middle East, particularly around...
Read more »
War was easy, peace is hard: Why the April 20 deadline will slip — Phar Kim BengAPRIL 11 — Washington's ongoing negotiations between the United States and Iran, now convened in Pakistan, were never meant to be easy.Yet what is increasingly evident is...
Read more »