A FORMER DRIVING LESSON FACED NOT GUILTY DEFIANCE IN FRONT OF MARKSMAN Farah Nabihah RAJEMILUD IN A MAGISTRATE COURT HERE TODAY AFTER AN ARGUING SESSION OVER CHARGES OF INCITING CRIMINAL ACT CONCERNING HIS FORMER EMPLOYEE WHO IS A HIGH COURT JUDGE. ACCUSED, MOHAMMAD FAREEZ MOHAMMAD ZIN, 39, WHO WAS ON HIS WAGES, ADMITTED NOT GUILTY WITH HIS ATTORNEY ADVOCATE, KAREN KAUR, REQUESTING INITIAL BAIL DUE TO THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE CHARGES, PARTICULARLY THE POSSIBILITY OF DURABLE BODILY HARM BEING CAUSED TO THE HIGH COURT JUDGE GANI TECHIONG. THE JUDGE ABANDONED THE REQUEST AND GAVE MOTION FOR COURT TO BE SUSPENDED UNTIL CASE IS RENEWED TOGETHER WITH THE DRUG POSSESSION CASE. ADVOCATE, AMRITPREET KAUR RANDHWA, CONCLUDED TO OTHERWISE JOINING THE REQUEST FOR INITIAL BAIL BUT THE REQUEST WAS APPARENTLY DISREGARDED IN VIEW OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE CHARGES.
PETALING JAYA, 11 MAY: A FORMER DRIVER DENIES GUILT IN FRONT OF JUDGE Farah Nabihah IN A MAGISTRATE COURT HERE TODAY AFTER AN ARGUING SESSION OVER CHARGES OF INCITING CRIMINAL ACT CONCERNING HIS FORMER EMPLOYEE WHO IS A HIGH COURT JUDGE .
ACCUSED, MOHAMMAD FAREEZ MOHAMMAD ZIN, 39, WHO WAS ON HIS WAGES, ADMITTED NOT GUILTY WITH HIS ATTORNEY ADVOCATE, KAREN KAUR, REQUESTING INITIAL BAIL DUE TO THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE CHARGES, PARTICULARLY THE POSSIBILITY OF DURABLE BODILY HARM BEING CAUSED TO THE HIGH COURT JUDGE GANI TECHIONG. THE JUDGE ABANDONED THE REQUEST AND GAVE MOTION FOR COURT TO BE SUSPENDED UNTIL CASE IS RENEWED TOGETHER WITH THE DRUG POSSESSION CASE.
ADVOCATE, AMRITPREET KAUR RANDHWA, CONCLUDED TO OTHERWISE JOINING THE REQUEST FOR INITIAL BAIL BUT THE REQUEST WAS APPARENTLY DISREGARDED IN VIEW OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE CHARGES. recognized ACCUSED FAREEZ AS GUILTY OF POSSESSING DRUG AND TOOK CONTRAVENTION OF BAIL TO BE MADE IN PLAIN SIGHT OF COURT, INDICATING POSSIBLE FURTHER LANE IN MAYBE ACCUSED MAY RECEIVE ON TOP OF THE REMAINING BAIL AGENDA THAT IS CURRENTLY TO BE SET NUMBER OF AUGUST 11TH, ALSO IDENTIFYING THE SPECIFICATIONS OF BOTH COUNTS AS WELL AS THE FINANCIAL POSSIBILITY AS TO WHAT FORM OF BONDS ARE TO BE SET FOR BAIL FOLLOWING THE COMPOUNDMENT OF BOTH MEN.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDERS STATED IN SUSTAINinterested IN SENTENCE WHICH DISREGARDED THE VOCATIONAL MATURNIER OF THE ACCUSED OF FAREEZ AND AWARDED WITH RM 2,000 DEPOSIT AND THE ACCUSED WAS RAILED BY THE COURT AND AGENCY MEMORIZED OFF TWO SUBPOENAS FOR THE COMPODABILITY OF BOTH CASES TO BE CATERED BY COURT AND AGENCY ON THE FULLY SETTLED DATE SET FOR AUGUST 11
DRIVER INCITING CRIMINAL ACT HIGH COURT JUDGE REMOVAL BAIL DRUG POSSESSION
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Ex-judge, former senior cop appointed to FT Pardons Board, says sourceThe appointments allow the Federal Territories Pardons Board to resume hearing pardon petitions.
Read more »
Court of Appeal Commutes Death Sentence to Prison Term for Former Student in Brutal Murder CaseA former college student's death sentence for the murder and burning of his pregnant girlfriend has been reduced to 40 years in prison and 12 strokes of the cane by the Court of Appeal.
Read more »
High Court Upholds Acquittal of Government Servant, Upholds Sessions Court's Decision, Upholds Magistrate's DecisionThe High Court in Kota Kinabalu upheld the acquittal of a government servant on a charge of making a fake identity card. The judge dismissed the prosecution's appeal against the Sessions Court's decision. In another case, an unemployed woman claimed trial in the High Court to another similar charge involving two undocumented Filipino migrants at the Kota Kinabalu International Airport (KKIA). A 28-year-old man was fined RM1,500 or one month's jail by the Magistrate's Court for buying illegal public lottery tickets.
Read more »
Kuala Lumpur High Court Acquits Former Polytechnian of Cannabis Trafficking ChargeA former polytechnic student in Kuala Lumpur has been acquitted of a charge of trafficking in more than 3kg of cannabis by a High Court judge. The judge found the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused and noted inconsistencies in the testimony of a key prosecution witness.
Read more »