Explains the geographic and political complexities of the Indus River System after British India's partition in 1947, the idea of an asymmetric approach between India and Pakistan in negotiations, and the final agreement between the two countries facilitated by the World Bank in 1960.
! Plus, enjoy an additional FREE RM10 when you sign up using code VERSAMM10 with a min. cash-in of RM100 today. T&Cs apply. MAY 9 — The Indus River System comprises six major rivers — the Indus, Chenab, Jhelum, Ravi, Beas and Sutlej — flowing through the territories of both India and Pakistan .
The system sustains drinking water, agriculture and electricity generation across the Indus Basin, supporting hundreds of millions of people on both sides of the border. When British India was partitioned in 1947, the Indus River System was also divided between the two successor states.
The geographic reality was stark: India, as the upper riparian state, held the headwaters of most rivers, while Pakistan’s agricultural heartland — the heavily irrigated Punjab plains — depended critically on continued water flows from the east. India, meanwhile, required access to the system for its own development needs in Punjab and Rajasthan, while also seeking stability and normalised relations with its new western neighbour.
Despite its own domestic pressures, India concluded a water-sharing agreement with Pakistan on 19 September 1960, facilitated by the World Bank. Pakistan’s strategy of delay and the 1954 World Bank proposal The trajectory of negotiations was shaped by an asymmetry between India’s constructive approach and Pakistan’s maximalist demands — an imbalance that anchored outcomes more in Pakistan’s favour than equity would suggest. The World Bank’s first substantive proposal of 5 February 1954 illustrates this clearly.
Even at this early stage, it required significant concessions from India: all planned Indian developments along the upper reaches of the Indus and Chenab were to be abandoned, with benefits accruing to Pakistan; India was required to forgo diverting approximately 6 MAF from the Chenab River; no Chenab waters at Marala would be available for Indian use; and no water development would be permitted in Kutch from the river system. Despite these impositions, India accepted the proposal in good faith.
Pakistan, however, delayed formal acceptance until 22 December 1958. During this period, India faced binding restrictions while Pakistan continued developing new uses on the Western rivers without equivalent constraints. The dynamic reinforced a structural lesson: obstruction yields leverage, cooperation incurs cost. Despite its own domestic pressures, India concluded a water-sharing agreement with Pakistan on 19 September 1960, facilitated by the World Bank.
— Reuters picUnder the Treaty, India received exclusive rights to the Eastern rivers — Sutlej, Beas and Ravi — while Pakistan received the Western rivers — Indus, Chenab and Jhelum. India was permitted limited non-consumptive use of the Western rivers, primarily run-of-river hydropower, subject to strict design constraints. In volumetric terms, the Eastern rivers carry approximately 33 million acre-feet annually, while the Western rivers carry approximately 135 MAF.
Pakistan thus controls roughly 80% of the system’s water, while India received about 20%. Importantly, India did not gain new water under the agreement; it formalised access to flows already within its territory while relinquishing claims to the larger Western system. The Treaty also included a financial provision under which India agreed to pay approximately £62 million to support water infrastructure in Pakistan-administered Kashmir.
This remains a rare precedent in international water agreements: an upstream state relinquishing the majority share of a river system while also financing downstream infrastructure as part of the settlement. The Treaty imposes a series of unilateral restrictions on India’s use of the Western rivers: limits on irrigated cropped area within Indian territory; restrictions on water storage capacity on the Western rivers; and strict design and operational constraints on hydropower projects, including pondage limits. These obligations are one-directional.
They constrain India’s development within its territory while imposing no equivalent transparency or restriction regime on Pakistan, embedding structural asymmetry in the framework itself. This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of
Indus River System Pakistan India Water-Sharing Agreement World Bank World Bank Proposal British India Partition 1947 Upper Riparian State Lower Riparian State Water Flows Headwaters Agricultural Heartland Domestic Pressures 1960 Facilitation
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Transport consultant concerned over Johor RTS feeder service shift to APM systemTransport consultant Rosli Khan has voiced concerns over reports that the Johor RTS feeder service may adopt an Automated People Mover system instead of the previously proposed Autonomous Rapid Transit system, citing differences in cost and suitability.
Read more »
Works Ministry Launches Malaysia’s First EV Charging System GuidelinesThe Works Ministry has officially launched Malaysia’s first dedicated guidelines for the design and installation of EV charging systems.
Read more »
Infinix Unveils GT 50 Pro With Built-In Liquid Cooling SystemInfinix has officially released the GT 50 Pro in the local market. The smartphone sports a built-in liquid cooling system.
Read more »
MyNIISe vendor told to proactively plan for any system glitches, says SaifuddinCEBU: Under the sweltering heat in this central Philippine province known for its beaches, convoys swept down palm-lined roads carrying South-East Asian leaders bound for the Asean Summit.
Read more »