KUANTAN, March 12 — The Temerloh High Court today acquitted and discharged former diplomat Datuk Zainal Abidin Alias and his son, Mohamed Rizal, of all charges related to...
An APM/LRT system for JB’s metro line is the way to go as city counts down to RTS, says international public transport expert At Joy Ho Kopitiam in Melaka, a big breakfast means curry ‘mee’, ‘char kway teow’ and a slice of pumpkin cakeFormer diplomat Datuk Zainal Abidin Alias and his son Mohamed Rizal were acquitted by the Temerloh High Court of drug trafficking and cultivation charges.
and enjoy FREE RM10 & when you sign up using code VERSAMM10 with min. cash of RM100 today! T&Cs apply.KUANTAN, March 12 — The Temerloh High Court today acquitted and discharged former diplomat Datuk Zainal Abidin Alias and his son, Mohamed Rizal, of all charges related to trafficking 989.6 grammes of cannabis , possession of cannabis oil, and cultivation of 102 cannabis plants at a house in Janda Baik, Bentong, in May 2022. Judge Roslan Mat Noor made the ruling after finding that the prosecution had failed to establish a prima facie case against Zainal Abidin, 82, and Mohamed Rizal, 56, at the end of the prosecution’s case. Lawyer Muhammad Farhan Shafee, who represented the father and son, said the court found that the prosecution had failed to prove a prima facie case against both accused, citing significant gaps in the investigation, topographical impossibilities, as well as the failure to link the accused to the prohibited items found on the property. He said the court accepted the defence’s argument that the 102 cannabis plants discovered on the property could not be physically seen from the location of the first accused at the time the arrest was made. “The judge said that the undulating terrain, steep slopes, and dense tropical foliage created a ‘shadow zone’, making it impossible for Zainal Abidin, who was 78 years old at the time, to see or be aware of the cultivation area from the garage or the main house,” he said when contacted. Muhammad Farhan said that the court also ruled that the prosecution had failed to prove that the accused had exclusive control over the premises. “The evidence that emerged during the trial showed that the house was not locked and could be accessed by various third parties. “The judge also highlighted several ‘missed opportunities’ by the investigating team, which rendered their findings unsafe to be accepted as strong evidence,” he said. He said that digital forensic analysis on devices belonging to the second accused, Mohamed Rizal, who was arrested in Shah Alam, Selangor, showed no communication, text messages, calls or emails linking him and his father to the alleged criminal activities. “The court ruled that Section 34 of the Penal Code could not be invoked to bridge this significant gap in the evidence,” he said. He added that the court also noted that Zainal Abidin’s conduct during the police raid was that of a cooperative and surprised individual, and he did not show any signs of fear or attempt to flee. “The judge concluded that the prosecution’s case was based merely on suspicion rather than credible evidence, and the court ordered that Zainal Abidin and Mohamed Rizal be acquitted and discharged and acquitted of all three charges without being called to enter their defence,” he said. Apart from Muhammad Farhan, both accused were also represented by Tan Sri Dr Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, Wee Yeong Kang and M Naresh, while the prosecution was led by Pahang prosecution director Shahrizat Ismail, together with Intan Nur Hilwani Rifin and Nur Syafiqah Noorinda. According to the charges, Zainal Abidin and Mohamed Rizal were jointly accused of trafficking 989.6 grammes of cannabis at a house in Kampung Sum-Sum Hilir, Janda Baik, at 6.10pm on May 21, 2022. The charge was framed under Section 39B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, read together with Section 34 of the Penal Code, which carries the mandatory death penalty upon conviction. The father and son were also charged with possession of 60 millilitres of cannabis oil at the same place and time under Section 9 of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, punishable under Section 9 of the same law, which provides for imprisonment of up to five years, or a fine of up to RM20,000, or both, upon conviction. They were also jointly charged with cultivating 102 cannabis plants at a house in Kampung Sum-Sum Hilir, Janda Baik, Bentong, at 6.10pm on May 21, 2022, under Section 6B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 , read together with Section 34 of the Penal Code, which carries life imprisonment and not less than six strokes of the cane upon conviction. — Bernama
Datuk Zainal Abidin Alias Mohamed Rizal Cannabis Trafficking Cannabis Cultivation Acquittal
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Former Student Appeals SPM Cheating Case to High CourtA former student, caught with an iPhone during a Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) trial examination, is appealing a Sessions Court ruling that dismissed her RM400,000 lawsuit and ordered her to pay costs. The case stems from a 2020 incident where the student was found with exam-related materials on her phone during a surprise inspection. The appeal challenges the court's decision, which deemed the teachers' actions justified and highlighted the discovery of exam papers as a key concern.
Read more »
ECRL diversion into Kuantan Port to be ready by end of 2026In part, the problem has to do with how users are asking their questions.
Read more »
Court Dismisses Lawsuit by Former Student Over Exam IncidentThe Kuala Terengganu Sessions Court rejected a lawsuit filed by a former student who was caught with an iPhone during a mock SPM exam six years ago. The court found the teachers' actions in conducting the surprise search reasonable and justified. The student, now 23, had sued teachers, the school principal, the Director General of Education, and the government alleging negligence, improper examination, and defamation. The court ordered the plaintiff to pay RM10,000 in costs, and the plaintiff has appealed to the High Court.
Read more »
Govt granted stay of RM3mil judgment in missing activist’s caseHigh Court allows payment to Amri Che Mat’s wife to be withheld pending an appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Read more »
Sabah to oppose federal bid to stay High Court order on 40pc revenue entitlementKOTA KINABALU, March 12 — The Sabah government will oppose an application by the federal Attorney General seeking to stay a High Court order made in October last year compelling...
Read more »
Court dismisses ophthalmologist’s appeal, orders RM1.28m in damages to mechanic blinded in one eyePUTRAJAYA, March 12 — The Court of Appeal today dismissed an ophthalmologist’s appeal to overturn a High Court ruling holding him liable for medical negligence and ordering him...
Read more »