High Court also says the Federal Court’s landmark ruling has left several unresolved questions surrounding Article 12(4) of the Federal Constitution.
PETALING JAYA: The Melaka High Court has refused to annul a woman’s childhood conversion to Islam , ruling that a landmark Federal Court decision does not affect unilateral conversion s registered before the case.
Judicial Commissioner S Raja Segaran said the central issue was whether the case of Indira Gandhi Mutho v. Pengarah Jabatan Agama Islam Perak & Ors, decided in 2018, could invalidate a conversion registered nine years earlier. In that case, the Federal Court ruled that the conversion of a minor with the consent of only one parent — known as a “unilateral conversion” — was invalid, as it contravened Article 12 of the Federal Constitution.
Then Federeal Court judge Zainun Ali, delivering the unanimous decision of a five-member bench, said that the term “parent” in Article 12 must be read to mean both parents provided they retain legal rights to the child.
“Indira Gandhi expressly directed that its decision was to have prospective effect. That direction is binding and must be applied,” Raja Segaran said in his 74-page judgment.
“It means that the consequences of Indira Gandhi for the formal validity of registered conversions are confined to conversions registered after the date of the decision. “Pre-2018 conversions are not invalidated by the dual-parent rule, regardless of whether both parents formally consented” Raja Segaran was presiding over a case brought by a 28-year-old woman seeking court declarations that she professed the Hindu faith and that her conversion to Islam as a child was void ab initio .
Born out of wedlock to Hindu parents, she said her mother — who embraced Islam in 2005 — converted her at age 11 four years later, without her father’s consent. The woman claimed she was coerced into converting and lacked a proper understanding of Islam, having been raised in a Hindu environment where she attended temples and took part in Hindu ceremonies.
The court, however, found her conversion process to be “statutorily valid on its face” under Sections 95, 100 and 105 of the Melaka Islamic Administration Enactment 2002. Allegations of coercion were rejected, with Raja Segaran noting contradictions between her mother’s 2025 affidavit and a statutory declaration made in 2009. Raja Segaran also found that the woman was not able to prove she had never professed Islam.
He said there was a constitutional distinction between “professing” and “practising” Islam, and that practising Hinduism did not automatically negate professing Islam, particularly where official records and her conduct as an adult showed otherwise. As a result, Raja Segaran declined to direct the defendants — the Melaka Islamic religious council, the state government, and the director-general of the national registration department — to make amendments to the woman’s name or religious status in their official records.
He, however, refused to award the defendants costs.
“The court is mindful that excessive costs orders may discourage bona fide legal recourse in cases involving genuine questions of constitutional identity and jurisdiction,” the judgment read. Although affirming Indira Gandhi’s case as binding precedent, Raja Segaran said it had left several observed unresolved constitutional questions surrounding Article 12, including: Lawyers Pavitra Loganathan and Darshela Hari Raja represented the woman, Nazri Hamid appeared for the council, while senior federal counsel Norafiah Saini and Khairul Azreem Mamat acted for the state government.
Federal Constitution Indira Gandhi Case Islam Melaka High Court Prospective Overruling Religious Identity Retrospective Unilateral Conversion
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Beats Elon Musk in Federal Court, but Legal Battle Undermines TrustOpenAI CEO Sam Altman won a case against Elon Musk in federal court, but the victory came at the cost of hearing his former colleagues call him a liar repeatedly under oath. The trial exposed doubts about Altman's leadership and the potential impact on OpenAI's credibility.
Read more »
EV adoption in Malaysia hits 94,165 units since 2018, says FadillahKUALA LUMPUR, May 20 — Electric vehicle (EV) adoption in Malaysia continues to show encouraging growth, with the total number of Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) passenger vehicles...
Read more »
Simen Rahmah Scheme: Expanded to Cover Affordable Housing Projects under Federal Government, States, and Private SectorThe Simen Rahmah Scheme, which offers cement at prices lower than the market rate, has been expanded to cover affordable housing projects under the Federal Government, state governments, and the private sector, with 1.6 million metric tonnes of cement allocated for building 500,000 affordable housing units.
Read more »
Ukrainian man's jail term and whipping upheld by Federal Court in drug trafficking caseA 48-year-old Ukrainian named Akahimo has been sentenced to a 30-year jail term and 16 lashes by the Federal Court for trafficking in 24.7kg of methamphetamine at a car park in Selangor four years ago. The unanimous decision was made after dismissing Akahimo's final appeal, which was led by Justice Rhodzariah Bujang.
Read more »