The U.K. Supreme Court is set to weigh whether the British government’s contentious policy to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda is lawful. The conservative government is challenging a Court of Appeal ruling in June that said the policy intended to deter immigrants from risking their lives crossing the English Channel in small boats is unlawful because the East African country is not a safe place to send them. Three days of arguments are scheduled to begin Monday, with the government arguing its poli
FILE - The Supreme Court entrance is photographed in London, Tuesday, Oct. 11, 2022. The British government’s contentious policy to stem the flow of migrants faces one of its toughest challenges this week as the U.K. Supreme Court weighs whether it’s lawful to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda starting on Monday, Oct. 9, 2023. FILE - Britain’s Prime Minister Rishi Sunak speaks during the Conservative Party annual conference in Manchester, England, Wednesday, Oct. 4, 2023.
The policy is intended to put a stop to the criminal gangs that ferry migrants across one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes by making Britain an unattractive destination because of the likelihood of being given a one-way ticket to Rwanda. The U.K. and Rwandan governments reached a deal more than a year ago that would send asylum-seekers to the East African country and allow them to stay there if granted asylum.Human rights groups have argued its inhumane to deport people more than 4,000 miles to a place they don’t want to live. They have also cited Rwanda’s poor human rights record, including allegations of torture and killings of government opponents.
The government argues the Court of Appeal had no right to interfere with the lower court decision and got it wrong by concluding deportees would be endangered in Rwanda and could face the prospect of being sent back to their home country where they could face persecution. The U.K. also says that the court should have respected the government’s analysis that determined Rwanda is safe and and that its government would abide by the terms of the agreement to protect migrants’ rights.
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
U.K. Supreme Court to weigh legality of plan to deport migrants to RwandaTo discourage migrants, the U.K. wants to deport to Rwanda some who arrive by boat without a visa. Human rights groups have sued, and the Supreme Court will begin hearing arguments on Oct. 9.
Read more »
UK Supreme Court weighs if it's lawful for Britain to send asylum-seekers to RwandaThe U.K. Supreme Court is set to weigh whether the British government’s contentious policy to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda is lawful.
Read more »
UK Supreme Court weighs if it's lawful for Britain to send asylum-seekers to RwandaThe U.K. Supreme Court is set to weigh whether the British government’s contentious policy to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda is lawful
Read more »
Muslims in Kenya protest at Supreme Court over its endorsement of LGBTQ right to associateHundreds of Muslims in Kenya’s capital have rallied outside the Supreme Court to protest its decision last month to reaffirm the LGBTQ community’s right of association
Read more »
Muslims in Kenya protest at Supreme Court over its endorsement of LGBTQ right to associateHundreds of Muslims in Kenya’s capital have rallied outside the Supreme Court to protest its decision last month to reaffirm the LGBTQ community’s right of association. The protesters say the verdict has condoned immorality. They are demanding the resignation of three of the five judges who supported the panel’s majority decision. The court last month reaffirmed an earlier ruling that the Non-Governmental Organization Board in Kenya had discriminated against LGBTQ people when it refused to register their association. The two dissenting judges opposed the ruling on grounds that Kenya’s laws outlaw same-sex relationships.
Read more »
Supreme Court Ruling Could Bail Out Donald TrumpTrump is likely to invoke presidential immunity before the Supreme Court, according to legal analysts.
Read more »