U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Friday again declined to block President Joe Biden's plan to cancel billions of dollars in student debt, this time in a challenge brought by two Indiana borrowers, even as a lower court considers whether to lift a freeze it imposed on the program in a different case.
Barrett denied an emergency request by the Indiana borrowers, represented by a conservative legal group, to bar the U.S. Department of Education from implementing the Democratic president's plan to forgive debt held by qualified people who had taken loans to pay for college.a similar request by a Wisconsin taxpayers organization represented by another conservative legal group.
Biden's plan, unveiled in August, was designed to forgive up to $10,000 in student loan debt for borrowers making less than $125,000 per year, or $250,000 for married couples. Borrowers who received Pell Grants to benefit lower-income college students would have up to $20,000 of their debt canceled.eliminate
The policy fulfilled a promise Biden made during the 2020 presidential campaign to help debt-saddled former college students. Democrats hope the policy will boost support for them in Tuesday's midterm elections in which control of Congress is at stake. Soon after they sued, the Department of Education created an opt-out option for borrowers. U.S. District Judge Richard Young on Oct. 21 dismissed the case, finding that the debt forgiveness program did not injure Garrison and Johnson.
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Abortion-rights protesters briefly interrupt Supreme CourtProtesters opposed to the Supreme Court’s decision overturning abortion rights briefly interrupted arguments at the court Wednesday, and they urged women to vote in next week’s elections. kprc2 click2houston scotus roevwade
Read more »
Supreme Court more diverse than lawyers who argue before itWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court looks more like America than it ever has. The lawyers who argue at the nation's highest court? Not so much.
Read more »
Supreme Court more diverse than lawyers who argue before itThe Supreme Court looks more like America than it ever has
Read more »
Supreme Court revisits affirmative action at our nation’s universitiesToday, nearly all colleges and universities use race as an admissions factor. They believe that they are serving a societal good and advancing the public policy of the United States.
Read more »
Cold case DNA match was too late for attempted murder conviction, Ohio Supreme Court rulesThe Ohio Supreme Court ruled Ralph Bortree's conviction in a 1993 neck slashing case must be tossed out because the statute of limitations ran out.
Read more »
Originalism on Trial at the Supreme CourtWill conservative justices discard originalism to do what’s best for business interests at the core of the Republican party?
Read more »