In the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was the deciding vote. After the ruling, Harlan Crow's family, significantly increased their annual contribution by 862 percent.
ATF argues that “the Crows’ influence-buying and political spending are emblematic of a larger problem: the ongoing attempt by billionaires to purchase our democracy.”how “billionaires are increasingly using their personal fortunes and the profits of connected corporations to drown out regular voters’ voices and elect hand-picked candidates who further rig the nation’s economy — especially the tax system.
Not counting dark money contributions, billionaires dumped $1.2 billion into the 2020 elections, 65 times more than the $16 million they donated in 2008, the report found. By last June, a few dozen billionaires had already pumped tens of millions of dollars into the 2022 midterms — mostly to support Republican candidates, including several election deniers — in a bid to ensure that Congress is full of lawmakers willing “to make their wealthy benefactors even richer.
“Billionaires shouldn’t be able to buy political access and influence with their enormous fortunes,” ATFto go, and to put real action towards making billionaires pay their fair share in taxes. Our democracy depends on it.”to right-wing groups involved in Supreme Court cases since Thomas was first confirmed to the bench in 1991.
Crow’s financial ties to Thomas, which the jurist failed to disclose and only came to light last month thanks to investigative
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Harlan Crow’s lavish trips with Clarence Thomas fuel calls for Supreme Court ethics codeWASHINGTON — Proponents of formal ethics rules for the Supreme Court are seeking to capitalize on a series of revelations about Dallas billionaire Harlan Crow’s...
Read more »
Disorder in the court: The impact of the Supreme Court Dobbs leak one year onThe Supreme Court faced an unprecedented breach of trust one year ago when a leaked draft opinion signaling the overturning of Roe v. Wade was published, an incident that continues to test the institution's foundation of trust and credibility.
Read more »
How South Carolina Ended Up With an All-Male Supreme CourtAfter the state supreme court struck down an abortion ban, legislators chose a man to replace its only female justice.
Read more »
The Supreme Court Just Unleashed a Flood of Lawsuits Against Big OilA new SCOTUS decision means climate court cases are about to get a lot more interesting.
Read more »
North Carolina Supreme Court hands Republicans big win, giving them potential 2024 edgeThe right-leaning North Carolina Supreme Court threw out a ruling against gerrymandered districts in the state and upheld a law requiring photo ID to vote.
Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court takes up fishermen's fight over US conservation fundingThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether the government can require commercial fishermen to help fund a program monitoring herring catches off New England's coast in a case that could undercut the regulatory power of federal agencies.
Read more »