The Supreme Court shouldn’t bless a giant cross on public property

Malaysia News News

The Supreme Court shouldn’t bless a giant cross on public property
Malaysia Latest News,Malaysia Headlines
  • 📰 latimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 82 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 36%
  • Publisher: 82%

At a time when Americans subscribe to a wide variety of religious beliefs — or none at all — it’s vital for government to be religiously neutral, writes the editorial board. (via latimesopinion)

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments about whether the 1st Amendment’s ban on the “establishment” of religion by government is violated by a 40-foot cross that sits on public land on a traffic island in Bladensburg, Md., near Washington, D.C.

The answer to that question is an emphatic yes, for the reason offered by a federal appeals court. It held that the so-called Peace Cross, erected in the 1920s as a memorial to the fallen in World War I, sends the message to a “reasonable observer” that the government agency that maintains the cross “either places Christianity above other faiths, views being American and Christian as one [and] the same, or both.

A decision to “grandfather in” the Peace Cross just because it’s been around for a long time would be disappointing. Even worse would be a ruling that used this case to loosen standards for judging all religious displays on public property. That’s essentially what a lawyer for the American Legion asked the court to do, suggesting to the court that such displays are unconstitutional only if they “coerce” onlookers to participate in a religious observance.

In defending the cross, a lawyer for the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission pointed out that there is a long tradition of crosses being used to memorialize war dead. But Justice Elena Kagan noted that, while a cross might seem to Christians the natural way to honor the fallen, “for members of other faiths, that symbol is not a way to memorialize the dead and does not have that meaning.

At a time when Americans subscribe to a wide variety of religious beliefs — or none at all — it’s vital for government to be religiously neutral. This imposing cross may serve as a commemoration of the dead, but it does so as the central symbol of the Christian religion. It shouldn’t be located on public property.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

latimes /  🏆 11. in US

Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court to decide if giant cross is religious symbol or secular memorial to war deadThe case raises a question that has vexed the justices for decades: What is the proper place for religion in American public life?
Read more »

Supreme Court seems open to allowing 40-foot cross on public landSupreme Court seems open to allowing 40-foot cross on public landThe high court on Wednesday heard over an hour of arguments in the case about the World War I memorial sometimes referred to as the 'Peace Cross.'
Read more »

Supreme Court grapples with cross on public land in major First Amendment caseSupreme Court grapples with cross on public land in major First Amendment case
Read more »

Supreme Court To Decide Fate Of World War I Memorial Cross On Public LandSupreme Court To Decide Fate Of World War I Memorial Cross On Public LandThe American Humanist Association is challenging the existence of a 40-foot cross on government-owned land, but the Trump administration hopes a newly conservative majority on the Supreme Court will agree to let it stand.
Read more »

In major religion case, Supreme Court weighs Maryland cross disputeIn major religion case, Supreme Court weighs Maryland cross disputeThe conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday takes up one of the bi...
Read more »

Supreme Court will look at whether a cross is promotion of religion or war memorialThe Supreme Court, long divided on the role of religion, is set to decide whether a 40-foot Latin cross in Maryland is an unconstitutional official endorsement of Christianity or a historic memorial for local soldiers who died in World War I.
Read more »

Supreme Court's Kavanaugh and Gorsuch seem split in blockbuster case over WW1 memorial crossSupreme Court's Kavanaugh and Gorsuch seem split in blockbuster case over WW1 memorial crossThe justices sparred over the meaning of a 93-year-old Latin cross that looms large over a crowded Maryland intersection the suburbs of the nation's capital.
Read more »

Supreme Court seems to seek narrow way to uphold cross that memorializes war deadSupreme Court seems to seek narrow way to uphold cross that memorializes war deadIs the Bladensburg Peace Cross unconstitutional or a secular honor to World War I heroes?
Read more »

Supreme Court to decide fate of WWI memorial cross in church and state disputeSupreme Court to decide fate of WWI memorial cross in church and state disputeThe fate of a 40-foot-tall cross built almost a century ago to honor World War I veterans is at the center of a separation of church and state dispute at the Supreme Court
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-25 19:04:03