Images Andy Warhol created of Prince are at the heart of a case the Supreme Court will examine on Wednesday. Warhol used a black-and-white portrait taken by Lynn Goldsmith as a reference point.
A portrait of Prince taken by Lynn Goldsmith in 1981 and 16 silk-screened images Andy Warhol later created using the photo as a reference. A Federal District Court judge found that Warhol's series is"transformative" because it conveys a different message from the original, and thus is fair use. A Second Circuit Court of Appeals panel disagreed.
On one side of the dispute is Lynn Goldsmith, famous for photographing rock stars and whose work is on more than 100 album covers. In 1981 Goldsmith was commissioned to shoot a series of photos of Prince forrock star was just starting to take off. Goldsmith photographed him in concert and invited him to her studio where she gave him purple eyeshadow and lip gloss to accentuate his sensuality and his androgyny. She even set her photography umbrellas to create pinpricks of light in his eyes.
The result, according to the foundation, is"a flat, impersonal, disembodied, masklike appearance" that is no longer vulnerable but iconic. Essentially, the foundation is arguing that Warhol used a black-and-white photograph as a building block, in much the way that a collage artist might use slices of different photos in a larger work.
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
The Supreme Court meets Andy Warhol, Prince and a case that could threaten creativityImages Andy Warhol created of Prince are at the heart of a case the Supreme Court will examine on Wednesday. Warhol used a black-and-white portrait taken by Lynn Goldsmith as a reference point:
Read more »
The Supreme Court meets Andy Warhol, Prince and a case that could threaten creativityImages Andy Warhol created of Prince, using a black-and-white portrait by Lynn Goldsmith as a reference, are at the heart of a case before the Supreme Court. The ruling could have rippling consequences for the art world.
Read more »
Clarence Thomas Cites His Prince Fandom “In The 80s” As Supreme Court Hears Landmark Copyright Case Over Andy Warhol ArtworksThe Supreme Court heard a consequential copyright case on Wednesday, having to do with whether Andy Warhol’s estate owes a photographer a licensing fee for basing his portraits on Prince on o…
Read more »
Supreme Court debates Warhol copyright case with broad implications for art, pop cultureWarhol's foundation asserts the artwork falls under the fair use doctrine, which permits reproduction of copyrighted material without permission in some circumstances, such as for criticism.
Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court mulls line between art and theft in Warhol caseThe U.S. Supreme Court is set to ponder in a case centering on paintings by the late artist Andy Warhol a question as philosophical as it is legal: what is the line between art and copyright theft when artwork is inspired by other material?
Read more »
The Supreme Court Will Hear the Warhol Copyright Case TomorrowThe Supreme Court is set to hear arguments for the Warhol v. Goldsmith copyright case, the ramifications of which will have a dramatic effect on photographers.
Read more »