Larry Hardison's name was chiseled into American legal history 46 years ago, when the Supreme Court ruled against him in a landmark religious accommodation case.
Larry Hardison’s name was chiseled into American legal history 46 years ago, when theThe airline clerk had asked his employer for Saturdays off so that he could observe the Sabbath, but the airline said no. And the
In 1967, Mr. Hardison worked for Trans World Airlines as a clerk at the carrier’s maintenance and overhaul facility in Kansas City, Missouri. One year later, he asked his employer to adjust his schedule so he could observe the Sabbath on Saturdays, following the practice of the Worldwide Church of God.
In the decades since the Hardison case, a number of employees and prospective hires have been fired or not hired owing to religious observance needs. “The No. 1 religious freedom problem facing Americans today is choosing between their religion and their job,” attorney Alan J. Reinach, who has specialized in religious accommodation cases involving worship, said last month.invited Nathan Lewin, an Orthodox Jewish attorney who filed a brief supporting Mr.
“We were faced with a situation in which the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was being amended in various other ways to give more power to the EEOC,” he said.had split on how religion is defined under Title VII and whether that statute includes a day of worship accommodation. No church leader, including the elder Armstrong and his son Garner Ted Armstrong, reached out to offer affirmation during the legal battle, he said.
The former TWA employee whose desire to have Saturdays off for worship led to the pending case said he appreciates the irony of today’s case: Gerald Groff, a former postal worker, is challenging the U.S. Postal Service over its requirement that he work on Sundays, which Mr. Groff says is his Sabbath.
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Pacific Legal Foundation snags Supreme Court trifectaAny time an advocate gets the U.S. Supreme Court to take up a case, it’s a bit like winning the appellate lottery.
Read more »
Chinese social media users recirculate false claim about 'US Supreme Court ruling on Covid vaccines'Chinese social media users have shared a screenshot of a year-old article from a US conspiracy site that falsely claims the Supreme Court ruled 'the Covid pathogen is not a vaccine and is unsafe' and has cancelled 'universal vax'. As of March 13, 2023, AFP has found no similar or related cases in the US Supreme Court docket. The United States has not made Covid-19 vaccination mandatory at a federal level for all people. The Covid-19 vaccines available in the US do not contain live viruses and are safe, experts say.
Read more »
Ohio Supreme Court appointee in abortion law case tied to anti-choice pregnancy centerThe judge chosen to take over for an Ohio Supreme Court justice who recused himself from the state’s abortion law case served on an advisory board for a crisis pregnancy center.
Read more »
Clarence and Ginni Thomas could be sidelined under Supreme Court 'model' ethics codeA proposal by outside interest groups for the Supreme Court to adopt a new 'model' ethics code could thrust Justice Clarence Thomas and his spouse, Ginni, further into the political limelight.
Read more »
Ohio Supreme Court Appointee in Abortion Case Tied to Anti-Choice Pregnancy CenterByrne is a devoted Catholic, based on his social media, where he expressed broad support of the late Pope Benedict XVI.
Read more »