Opinion | The Supreme Court’s Elections Muddle

From WSJopinion: So much for the radical Supreme Court. A 6-3 majority rejected in Moore v. Harper the argument advanced by some conservatives that the U.S. Constitution bars state courts from reviewing Congressional maps and voting laws.

Journal Editorial Report: The Dobbs decision overturned the politics of abortion. Images: AP/Zuma Press Composite: Mark Kelly

So much for the radical Supreme Court. A 6-3 majority on Tuesday rejected the argument advanced by some conservatives that the U.S. Constitution bars state courts from reviewing Congressional maps and voting laws. The result isn’t the runaway victory that progressives claim, but it will lead to more election-law controversies.Continue reading your article with

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

WSJ /  🏆 98. in US

Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

SCOTUS Sides With Democracy in Moore v. HarperThe Supreme Court just decided a case at the center of efforts to overturn the 2020 election, and it’s more bad news for Trump.
Read more »

Opinion | The ‘King’ and the Supreme CourtFrom WSJopinion: The mixed opinions in U.S. v. Texas deserve more attention because of their implications for executive power
Read more »