Mississippi discriminates against Black residents with appointed judges, Justice Department says

Malaysia News News

Mississippi discriminates against Black residents with appointed judges, Justice Department says
Malaysia Latest News,Malaysia Headlines
  • 📰 WashTimes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 36 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 18%
  • Publisher: 63%

A new Mississippi law discriminates against residents of the majority-Black capital city of Jackson by requiring the appointment of some judges in a state where most judges are elected, the U.S. Justice Department said in court papers filed Wednesday.

and Hinds County, where the city is located. Clarke said the law creates a “two-tiered system of justice” with judges and prosecutors chosen by state officials.

“This thinly-veiled state takeover is intended to strip power, voice and resources away from Hinds County’s predominantly-Black electorate, singling out the majority-Black Hinds County for adverse treatment imposed on no other voters in the State of Mississippi,” Clarke said. U.S. District Judge Henry Wingate has temporarily blocked the law from taking effect. Wingate would have to approve thesaid in its court filing Wednesday that the Mississippi law discriminates against people based on race, violating the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection guarantee.with prosecutors appointed by the Mississippi attorney general and a judge appointed by the Mississippi Supreme Court chief justice.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

WashTimes /  🏆 235. in US

Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Trump Loses Justice Department Backing in Defamation CaseTrump Loses Justice Department Backing in Defamation CaseIn a reversal, the Justice Department said it would no longer represent former President Donald Trump in a continuing defamation lawsuit filed by writer E. Jean Carroll
Read more »

Trump can be held liable in writer’s defamation lawsuit after Justice Department reverses courseTrump can be held liable in writer’s defamation lawsuit after Justice Department reverses courseThe Justice Department has reversed its position that Donald Trump can't be held personally liable for remarks he made about a woman who accused him of rape because he was president when he made the comments
Read more »

Justice Department reverses position, won't support shielding Trump in original E. Jean Carroll lawsuitJustice Department reverses position, won't support shielding Trump in original E. Jean Carroll lawsuitBREAKING: In a reversal, the DOJ said Donald Trump isn't shielded from liability in an E. Jean Carroll defamation lawsuit.
Read more »

Justice Department reverses course on defending Trump in E. Jean Carroll caseJustice Department reverses course on defending Trump in E. Jean Carroll caseUS Justice Department abandons plans to defend Donald Trump in a lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll, saying it no longer believes he was acting within the scope of his presidential duties in 2019 when he allegedly defamed the writer.
Read more »

Trump can be held liable in writer’s defamation lawsuit after Justice Department reverses courseTrump can be held liable in writer’s defamation lawsuit after Justice Department reverses courseThe Justice Department said Donald Trump can be held personally liable for remarks he made about a woman who accused him of rape — a reversal of its position that he was protected because he was president when he made the remarks.
Read more »

Trump can be held liable in writer’s defamation lawsuit after Justice Department reverses courseTrump can be held liable in writer’s defamation lawsuit after Justice Department reverses coursePreviously, the department had agreed with Trump's attorneys that he was protected from the lawsuit by the Westfall Act, which provides federal employees absolute immunity from lawsuits brought over conduct occurring within the scope of their employment.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-03-01 03:27:55