Farid Kamil officially pronounced the divorce against Diana Danielle through a Google Meet call.
, their story became the talk of netizens for months.
The case was taken to court with the 42-year-old being persistent on mending his marriage with his wife but it seems the case has now come to a close.As of yesterday , the two entertainers are now officially divorced. It was reported that Farid Kamil pronounced the divorce against his wife Diana Danielle before the Petaling Syariah Lower Court Judge Shukran Yusof through a Google Meet online call.
The court has granted the divorce application that was filed by the starlet back in March under Section 47 of the Islamic Family Law Enactment 2003 on the grounds that she and her husband had irreconcilable differences. After the application was granted, the judge ordered the singer to undergo the “Iddah” period; a time period a Muslim woman must observe after the death of or divorcing her husband, during which she may not marry another man .As for the reason why the divorce process was not done face-to-face in court, Farid Kamil’s lawyer, Syarie Fakhrul Azman Abu Hassan clarified that his client was unwell and was not able to come to the proceedings, thus why it was done online instead.
Meanwhile, Diana Danielle’s lawyer Datuk Akberdin Abdul Kader confirmed that she and her now ex-husband had also come to an agreement on other related issues after their divorce. While it was not mentioned in detail, it can be assumed that both parties were granted custody over their two children.
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Farid Kamil divorces wife Diana DaniellePETALING JAYA, Aug 10 — Actor Farid Kamil and his wife, actress Diana Danielle, are legally divorced today after nearly 11 years of marriage. Farid, or his full name is Farid...
Read more »
Farid Kamil divorces wife Diana Danielle via Google MeetLawyer Syarie Fakhrul Azman Abu Hassan, representing Farid, says his client could not attend the court proceeding as he was unwell.
Read more »