A California theme park will require chaperones for underage guests after multiple fights broke out over the weekend and forced the park to close hours early.
amusement park will begin implementing a chaperone policy for underage guests after a series of fights between park goers over the weekend resulted in the facility shutting down early.
"One chaperone may accompany no more than three guests ages 17 or younger per day," the policy states. "Chaperones must accompany their party during entry, remain with their party at all times during their visit to the park, and be available by phone throughout their stay."
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Following Teen Fights, Knott's Berry Farm Will Have a New Chaperone Policy on FridayAny guests at Knott's age 17 or younger that don't have a chaperone over the age of 21 will be 'ejected from the park,' starting this Friday, the theme park said. The new policy was implemented after a brawl at the park on Saturday. See the new rules here:
Read more »
Sesame Place apologizes after Black girls snubbed at paradeA Sesame Street-themed amusement park has apologized after a viral video appeared to show a costumed character waving off two 6-year-old Black girls at a parade in Philadelphia.
Read more »
Sesame Place apologizes after Black girls snubbed at paradeA Sesame Street-themed amusement park has apologized after a viral video appearing to show a costumed character waving off two 6-year-old Black girls at a parade outside Philadelphia
Read more »
Opinion | The Future of the Planet Is in Our Hands—Effective Activism Is Essential'Building long-term progressive power is key to bringing into force a comprehensive climate change policy.'
Read more »
Georgia Vietnam veteran with mental disability dies after Birmingham police slam him to hospital floor, lawsuit allegesAccording to the lawsuit, police determined the officer’s use of force was proper and acceptable, “even when the officer violated policy and/or used excessive, unconstitutional and/or unskillful force.”
Read more »