This article discusses the implications of Singapore's sovereignty over Batu Puteh, a small rock awarded to Singapore by the International Court of Justice in 2008. It examines the impact on maritime boundaries, exclusive economic zones, and continental shelf claims in the South China Sea.
On January 10, 2025, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad reportedly remarked, “Why fuss over a rock?” when commenting on his administration’s decision to withdraw Malaysia’s application for a review of the Batu Puteh case at the International Court of Justice ( ICJ ). The statesman expressed that Malaysia gained little from possessing Batu Puteh , which is roughly the size of a football field. In 2008, the ICJ awarded sovereignty over Batu Puteh (also known as Pedra Branca) to Singapore.
However, Middle Rocks, located about one kilometre from Batu Puteh, was recognised as Malaysian territory. The ICJ did not decide on the sovereignty of South Ledge. Although the ICJ resolved the territorial dispute between Malaysia and Singapore over Batu Puteh, several issues arose from this decision: How will Malaysia and Singapore demarcate the maritime boundary between Middle Rocks and Batu Puteh? Can Singapore claim an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and continental shelf in the South China Sea due to its sovereignty over Batu Puteh? These questions must be addressed in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), to which both Malaysia and Singapore are parties. In 2008, the ICJ confirmed Singapore’s sovereignty over Batu Puteh and Malaysia’s sovereignty over Middle Rocks. However, the ICJ did not clearly determine the status of South Ledge, a maritime feature that appears only during low tide, as it lies in overlapping waters between mainland Malaysia, Batu Puteh, and Middle Rocks. Malaysia and Singapore have established a Joint Technical Committee to delineate the maritime boundary around Batu Puteh and Middle Rocks and to resolve the sovereignty of South Ledge. Before gaining sovereignty over Batu Puteh, Singapore could not claim maritime territory in the South China Sea due to being bordered by Johor on both its western (Pontian district) and eastern (Mersing district) sides. To the south, Singapore faces the Singapore Strait, sharing maritime borders with Indonesia’s Batam and Bintan islands. After securing Batu Puteh in 2008, Singapore, like Malaysia and Indonesia, can now claim territorial sea in the South China Sea adjacent to Batu Puteh. Middle Rocks and Batu Puteh are approximately one kilometre apart. Since countries can claim territorial seas up to 12 nautical miles, maritime claims between Malaysia and Singapore are bound to overlap in this area. Had Batu Puteh remained under Malaysian sovereignty, the waters would solely be shared between Malaysia and Indonesia, excluding Singapore. 3. Can Singapore claim an exclusive economic zone (eez) or continental shelf in the South China Sea due to Batu Puteh? Batu Puteh is essentially a rock with the Horsburgh Lighthouse, built in 1851, standing on it. Fundamentally, an island is a landmass surrounded by water that remains above water at high tide and can sustain human habitation or economic life. Examples of genuine islands in Malaysia include Langkawi, Penang, Kukup, Tioman, and Payar. These islands are true islands, unlike mere rocks in the sea. According to Article 121(2) of UNCLOS, islands can generate territorial seas, EEZs, and continental shelves. Unlike Langkawi, Tioman, or Payar, Batu Puteh is a barren rock where nothing grows naturally. Without the Horsburgh Lighthouse built by the British, it would not be habitable. Rock or island, the fact remains that Singapore’s sovereignty over Batu Puteh allows it to claim maritime areas in the South China Sea, which it previously could not. Malaysia’s loss of Batu Puteh in 2008 was a shocking event for many. It serves as a lesson that every inch of our territory, no matter how small, must be safeguarded and defended by all Malaysians. Batu Puteh is now in the hands of another nation. We must not repeat the mistakes and negligence of past administrations during British colonial rule or subsequent to gaining independence, ensuring that no territory rightfully ours is claimed by other nations.
BATU PUTEH SINGAPORE MALAYSIA MARITIME DISPUTE ICJ
Malaysia Latest News, Malaysia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Johor Seeks Accountability for Batu Puteh Loss to SingaporeThe Johor state government is demanding legal consequences for those responsible for Malaysia's loss of Batu Puteh to Singapore in 2008. Chief Minister Onn Hafiz Ghazi criticized the federal government's 2018 decision to withdraw an application for an ICJ review, citing new evidence supporting Malaysia's claim. A Royal Commission of Inquiry recommended criminal investigations into individuals involved in the case.
Read more »
Johor MB: Withdrawal of Batu Puteh ICJ Review Application a 'Dark Chapter' in HistoryThe Johor Menteri Besar criticized the Federal Government's decision to withdraw the application to review the International Court of Justice's decision on Batu Puteh, calling it a 'dark chapter' in Malaysia and Johor's history. He argued that the withdrawal marks the permanent loss of the Johor Sultanate's territorial rights and demanded accountability for those involved.
Read more »
RCI Batu Puteh: Semakan kehakiman Tun M ditolakKUALA LUMPUR: Mahkamah Tinggi di sini hari ini menolak semakan kehakiman Tun Dr. Mahathir agar beliau dan peguamnya dibenarkan hadir sepanjang prosiding Suruhanjaya Siasatan Diraja (RCI) Bagi Mengkaji Pengendalian Perkara Berkaitan Kes Kedaulatan Batu Puteh, Batuan Tengah dan Tubir Selatan.
Read more »
RCI Batu Puteh: Mereka berbohong, saya maluBekas Perdana Menteri itu berkata, ketiga-tiga individu itu ternyata berbohong selepas mendakwa keputusan untuk tidak meneruskan semakan dan tafsiran berhubung isu Pulau Batu Puteh dibuat tanpa merujuk kepada Jemaah Menteri.
Read more »
Dr Mahathir accuses three of his Cabinet of lying about Batu PutehHONG KONG: China announced on Tuesday (Dec 17) a relaxation of its visa-free transit policy, extending the permitted stay for eligible foreign travellers to 240 hours, or 10 days, from the original 72-144 hours, as authorities aim to lure more foreign visitors.
Read more »
Dr Mahathir refutes former Cabinet members’ claims on Batu Puteh decision: ‘They lied, I’m ashamed’KUALA LUMPUR, Dec 17 — Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said he feels ashamed over statements made by three former Cabinet members regarding the Batu Puteh issue. Utusan Malaysia...
Read more »